Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice law in Michigan, in 2006, is a complex and highly
regulated area of law as a result of Republican legislatures and Governor
Engler’s attempts to limit the amounts of money that can be recovered, shorten
the statutes of limitations, that is the time within which lawsuits might be brought,
as well as a variety of other changes which make the litigation of these cases
more expensive and complex.
As a result of the Michigan Legislative and Michigan Supreme Court
decisions limiting the rights and recoveries of medical malpractice patients in
Michigan, the public must carefully select an attorney who is experienced in the
specialty field of medical malpractice.
Patients used to have three years from the date of malpractice to file a
suit. That has now been shortened to two years. Although patients can still
recover for past and future medical expenses, health insurers are increasingly
asking to be repaid the health insurance dollars they paid for the malpractice
patient’s care. The Michigan legislature has limited the amount of money that can
be recovered for pain and suffering to $380,000 where the patient, regardless of
the consequences, has an injury that does not involve permanent paralysis,
coma and/or brain damage. Where there is permanent paralysis, coma and/or
brain damage, the maximum amount that can be recovered is $680,000. The law
also provides that if a patient is receiving disability insurance benefits, life
insurance benefits or other benefits from “collateral sources”, the wrongdoing
defendant gets the benefit of the coverage purchased by the patient and these
sums are subtracted from any recovery the patient might make.
Some medical specialties, such as neurosurgery, orthopedics and
obstetrics and gynecology present special medical malpractice litigation
problems. The Michigan Society of Orthopedic Surgeons, the Michigan Society of
Neurosurgery and the Michigan Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have
met and agreed that none of their members, regardless of the merits of the case,
will testify against other members of the same specialty. This forces patient
plaintiffs and their attorneys to seek expert testimony from experts outside of the
State of Michigan. This creates a strong disadvantage to the patient plaintiff
because all of the defendant physician’s experts come from hospitals and
universities in the State of Michigan.
The general rules outlining and defining medical malpractice remain the
same, however. In order for a claim to be brought, the patient must show that the
physician deviated from the accepted medical standard of care of that specialty
and that an injury was caused by that deviation that otherwise would not have
happened. Because of the changes in Michigan’s Supreme Court case law and
legislative changes as well, the cost of bringing medical malpractice cases has
doubled or tripled in most instances over the last l0 years. This means that
attorneys practicing in the specialty of medical malpractice litigation may now
reject cases that previously would have been accepted because the amount of
the recovery is less or equal to the amount of money that would have to be spent
to bring the case.
Careful case selection and work-up prior to filing suit is the cornerstone of
a successful medical malpractice case. Attorney Larry Charfoos of Charfoos &
Christensen recovered the first million dollar medical malpractice verdict in 1973.
In the approximate 30 years since that verdict, attorneys with Charfoos &
Christensen have developed and expanded their expertise in the field of medical
malpractice at the trial level, the trial preparation and work-up levels. Charfoos &
Christensen attorneys have authored and co-authored scholarly articles and
books (see Publications) on a multitude of medical malpractice issues causing
the firm to be recognized as the preeminent medical malpractice firm in the State
of Michigan.

Monday, April 25, 2011

orkut blog: Badges on orkut! Can you collect them all?

orkut blog: Badges on orkut! Can you collect them all?: "You might have noticed something new in orkut. Some of your friends may have little icons on their profile pages, and you may start seeing ..."

Wednesday, April 20, 2011


Saving your own life can be as easy as getting a colonoscopy screening.
Over 50,000 people died from colon cancer in 2010. Over 100,000 new cases of colon cancer were diagnosed that same year. Fortunately, there is a 90% survival rate when the cancer is treated early. Unfortunately, only 40% of colon cancers are found early.
Everyone 50 years old or over should have a colonoscopy if they haven’t had one yet. Most insurers cover this test.
Although the colonoscopy is painless, the 24 hour prep, although painless too, is not fun. The bowel preparation requires the patient to drink approximately 1 gallon of special liquid that cleans all fecal material from the bowel. This allows the colonoscopist a totally clear view of your bowel.
For people found with 1 or 2 small precancerous polyps, the next follow-up colonoscopy should be in 5 years. 3 years follow up is recommended for people will bigger or multiple polyps. For people with benign polyps or none at all, a colonoscopy is recommended every 10 years thereafter.
If you are 50 yrs old and have not had your first colonoscopy yet, do not put it off any longer. If you wait until you have symptoms, such as rectal bleeding, abdominal distension, or abdominal pain, your chances of recovery may be diminished.
As attorneys’ in the business of suing physicians and hospitals that fail in their obligations to patients, we are also mindful of patients’ obligations to themselves. For this reason we have inserted this little column.

J.Douglas Peters
5510 Woodward Ave.
Detroit, MI 48202
(313) 875-8080